On 09/10/10 22:23, Scott Furry wrote:
LibreOffice Community,
As suggested, this post is intended to get the opinion of the
community about how best to deliver LibreOffice to its users.
Given that LibreOffice is an important and viable alternative to
paid-for office productivity software, and we all feel strongly and
passionately about the direction of LibreOffice, input about the
community members' expectations/needs/users is needed.
<snip>
- Linux users have discussed vast amounts opinions on packaging in
Linux. Some have questioned if distributing packages is a good thing.
-----------------------
This survey is to gauge the views of the LibreOffice community on the
install/update method of LibreOffice. Please voice your opinion so
that these considerations may be taken into account when the
LibreOffice method of install/update is studied by the developer team.
Please *bottom-post* your opinions.
How do you expect LibreOffice to be updated?
As a Debian GNU/ Linux user my system benefits from the most advanced
package update/ maintenance system (apt), so as long as the Deb package
maintainers can package LibO, that would be my preferred way of having
it installed and updated
How do you Install/Update LibreOffice?
See above.
What do you expect when Installing/Updating LibreOffice?
No unmet dependencies, for the installation to clear up any cruft and
obsolete packages.
Other programs have separate updating programs (iTunes being an
example), if it was technically feasible, would having a separate
install program for LibreOffice (with updating features) be useful to
you?
Personally, no.
Would having a download and update site, as well as a Unix|Linux
package repository site, be of value to you?
Yes, for general purposes and potential new users from the world of
Slackware or distros without advanced package management systems (better
watch out for flames now from angry Slackers!!)
-----------------------
Please note that I am not affiliated with DocumentFoundation. I am
like you, a community member who wants to see LibreOffice be very
successful.
I appreciate you doing this, and at the risk of hi-jacking this thread,
perhaps we can also request that LibO developers put some thought into
resolving the long list of counter-intuitive and unnecessarily complex
ways of going about things that currently plague OOo from text wrapping
in Impress to watermarks in Writer to the intransigence of bullets to be
indented, etc. These kinds of small incremental modifications would, I
think, help make LibO more successful.
AG
So let's hear what you think folks?
Regards,
Scott Furry
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Survey|Opinion - LibreOffice Install and Update (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.