On 13/10/10 01:34, Paul A Norman wrote:
I appreciate you doing this, and at the risk of hi-jacking this thread, perhaps we can also request
that LibO developers put some thought into resolving the long list of counter-intuitive and
unnecessarily complex ways of going about things that currently plague OOo from text wrapping in
Impress to watermarks in Writer to the intransigence of bullets to be indented, etc. These kinds
of small incremental modifications would, I think, help make LibO more successful.
This would probably warrant a whole forum level of its own, and would
provide a valuable resource for developers. Ironing out a list of such
things from the very beginning woud definetly put the development
process into getting LiBO right uo "there", well ahead.
OOO has in a sense grown incrementally - with the consequence of some
things being added on top of things or grafted in, and is this new
venture going to provide the oppertunity to identify what those things
may be, and set things straight before more layers are added on top?
As a non-programmer, [1] I haven't a clue as to how to influence what
happens in a piece of software that I rely on to handle the demands of
my postgraduate studies course work as well as for my family's personal
use. I +do+ know what works for me as a user however, and my partner is
quite vocal in her dissatisfaction/ frustration with a given user
operation or UI design issues, so between the two of us there are a
number of niggles - not bugs, or at least, not that I can categorically
define as such - that make OOo/ LibO feel clunky and awkward at times, &
as a generally very user I would like to contribute in some small way.
A top-level forum for users to provide feature/ amendment requests &
feedback to developers might be a pretty good thing to make LibO driven
by a user base as the (certainly in my case!) grateful beneficiary of
robust (i.e. stable, resource efficient & secure) code that stays out of
the way of the user, does what the user wants it to do in a way that is
either intuitive or self-evident to the user, and offers a clean and
meaningful UI.
Not really asking for a lot then, am I? :-)
Cheers
AG
[1] Altho' I've dabbled & while I find it fascinating by what can be
accomplished with basic electronic on/ off switches, I stumble at object
oriented programming & classes, etc., and have difficulty expressing
concepts in code (Python, Scheme, bash, C, netLOGO - the common
denominator is me!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Survey|Opinion - LibreOffice Install and Update (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.