On 2010-10-12 8:34 PM, Paul A Norman wrote:
I appreciate you doing this, and at the risk of hi-jacking this
thread, perhaps we can also request that LibO developers put some
thought into resolving the long list of counter-intuitive and
unnecessarily complex ways of going about things that currently
plague OOo from text wrapping in Impress to watermarks in Writer to
the intransigence of bullets to be indented, etc. These kinds of
small incremental modifications would, I think, help make LibO more
successful.
This would probably warrant a whole forum level of its own, and
would provide a valuable resource for developers. Ironing out a list
of such things from the very beginning woud definetly put the
development process into getting LiBO right uo "there", well ahead.
I'd start with perusing the current OOo bug tracker for the top ranking
bugs and enhancement requests, but I would like to see a purging (don't
bring all of the cruft)...
This is another good way that people like me (non-programmers) can
participate...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Survey|Opinion - LibreOffice Install and Update (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.