Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Jon,

I really agree with you.

Its not about how the 'name' works for any of us, but for potential users.

As bad as it may sound, we need to think as if we were actually
relying on marketing it as a paid product (which I am not advocating)
but still need to think about market reactions as commercial people
would - and even better!!!

Paul

On 12 October 2010 09:36, Jon Hamkins <hamkins@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 10/07/2010 04:16 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:

If I have to explain to someone what "LibreOffice" means, it's easy:
"Libre means free, as in liberty or freedom."

If I have to explain what "OpenOffice.org" means, it's a much bigger
problem, even without the complication of the ".org" part. Most people
have never heard of "open source" or "open standards" or "open" anything
else.

This post just doesn't resonate with me at all.  To explain what LibreOffice
means, first I have to explain what libre means, because it isn't an English
word.  It's as easy to explain as any other foreign word, I suppose, but
that's not exactly a ringing endorsement.

On the other hand, I don't have to explain OpenOffice.org, because it's
already in the lexicon -- 300 million people have already downloaded it.
 For those that haven't, they at least already know what "open" means, and
it's easy to explain how that relates to the software.  Also, people who
know about "open source" instantly recognize from the name its similarity to
other open tools such as openssh, openldap, openvpn, etc. -- in the same way
that the prefix "gnu" indicates something about gnuplot, gnucash, and gnupg.

A good chunk of the posts on this mailing list, and in comments to stories
on TDF announcement, are about the choice of the name, how to pronounce it,
etc.  Slashdot comments were particularly harsh, and fairly universal, in
their dislike for the name:

http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/09/28/143204/OpenOfficeorg-Declares-Independence-From-Oracle-Becomes-LibreOffice
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1801996&cid=33722340
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1801996&cid=33725276

I'm not going to let my disappointment in the name damper my enthusiasm of
the project, which is strong.  I'm talking up the project to friends and
family, even.  Others are in the same boat.  This shouldn't be confused with
*liking* the name.

    ----Jon

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are available at
http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.