Why don't we use the pushed rsync servers?
They get the files already in advance. And the load of pushing them for
the right modification is probably not high.
So these servers have realy mostly like the same content as the master
The server I run, could handle much more load as it has at the moment.
Traffic, CPU and HD load.
Am 05.08.2011 17:44, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Thorsten Behrens wrote on 2011-08-05 16:42:
Sorry, that was me. Machine was under heavy load again, we'll come
up with an alternative solution.
sorry that I missed to notify you. Indeed, we need to move the
mirroring system to another machine in order to not interfere with
other services. It needs to be a stronger machine, solely doing rsync
services, plus we maybe should look into some tiered mirroring system
to distribute the load.
Give us a few days to investigate and react - sorry for the
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy