Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Why don't we use the pushed rsync servers?
They get the files already in advance. And the load of pushing them for
the right modification is probably not high.
So these servers have realy mostly like the same content as the master

The server I run, could handle much more load as it has at the moment.
Traffic, CPU and HD load.

Florian Bircher

Am 05.08.2011 17:44, schrieb Florian Effenberger:

Thorsten Behrens wrote on 2011-08-05 16:42:
Sorry, that was me. Machine was under heavy load again, we'll come
up with an alternative solution.

sorry that I missed to notify you. Indeed, we need to move the
mirroring system to another machine in order to not interfere with
other services. It needs to be a stronger machine, solely doing rsync
services, plus we maybe should look into some tiered mirroring system
to distribute the load.

Give us a few days to investigate and react - sorry for the


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.