On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Greg Stein <email@example.com> wrote:
Ben explained much of this already, but let's see if I can add some more:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 14:46, plino <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
As Ben has explained later in this thread, you never had that right.
Ergo, Apache has not removed any rights from You.
This is why I think the statement "removes rights from people's
contributions" is wrong, or there is some other right that I'm unaware
GPL does say that if you make a derivative work and distribute it to someone
else, you must provide that person with the source code under the terms of
the GPL so that they may modify and redistribute it under the terms of the
GPL as well.
The key thing being "that person". That person is most likely not You,
the developer who is contributing to the software. Thus, You won't get
those changes unless "that person" decides to pass them back to you.
So you don't necessarily have a "right" to the code. You are relying
on the goodwill of "that person" to help you out. Of course, they
might not even know who you are. They might not care. They might not
ever ask for the source code.
It's a common misconception. If a TV uses Linux (most LCD/LED TV use Linux),
you do not need to show evidence you bought one in order to ask for
the Linux source code.
See the GPLv2 (per Linux kernel) license text,
“Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years,
to give **any third party**, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution,”
This misconception is mentioned and then explained often at the
http://gpl-violations.org/ mailing list.
The copyright holder ends up doing the suing for the source code in
order to make a manufacturer comply.
It is easier to do so, with more chances for success. Then, once the
anyone can easily get the source code. And manufacturers do comply.
And talking about TVs, a certain manufacturer uses both copyleft and
in order to make the firmware. While you get the source code of the
copyleft software, there is no
mention whatsoever for the permissive software.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
(message not available)
- RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy