Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:12 AM, James Wilde <wilde.james@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, I appreciate that it would mean two sets of numbers for extensions,
but I can imagine that, in a not too distant future, OOo and LibO are going
to grow apart, possibly sufficiently that an extension for the one will not
work with the other.  Why not accept that from day 1?


That's a very good point. +1

-Thiago

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.