NoOP is right, I wrote the quoted text. Your explanation is well
noted and I can see the reasoning behind it. The sooner we can change
the interface and feel of LibreOffice then the better, as I for one
don't want such a Oracle aligning feature as version numbers staring
me in the face every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite
On 11/20/10, NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote:
Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office
project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in
peoples minds that we are a separate project.
...
I wrote none of that. Please mind your attributions.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
--
Sean White,
I've Seen the Cow Level
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.