Sean White skrev:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system.  Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in
peoples minds that we are a separate project
I will suggest another version scheme like the one the Linux 
distribution Ubuntu uses.
The year and month: 9.04, 9.10, 10.4 and 10.10.
I know it is very difficult to release at a specific month because there 
could be a lot of issues that postpone a release date.
Maybe it should only be the target to have one major release each year 
and smaller updates and security releases with minor version numbers:
Yearly major release: 11 and 12
Update release: 11.1, 11.2 and 12.1
Security releases: 11.0.5, 11.1.5, 11.2.5, 12.0.5 and 12.1.5 (security 
release 5)
Just a suggestion.
The most enjoyable
--
.: Claus Agerskov :: ca@agercon.dk :: 27 59 69 96 :.
.: Robinievej 129 :: 2620 Albertslund :.
.: AgerCon :: www.agercon.dk :.
.: Konsulentydelser inden for åbne standarder og fri software :..
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.