On Nov 21, 2010, at 22:31 , jonathon wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2010 09:15 PM, James Wilde wrote:
...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? And only then?
Unless there is a "compatibility tag" for extensions, the way that there
is for firefox, LibO is stuck with the version numbering that OOo uses,
if it wants to retain compatibility with those extensions.
Well, I appreciate that it would mean two sets of numbers for extensions, but I can imagine that,
in a not too distant future, OOo and LibO are going to grow apart, possibly sufficiently that an
extension for the one will not work with the other. Why not accept that from day 1?
//James
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: Version Numbers? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.