Sean White skrev:> As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project>
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version> numbering system. Wouldn't
it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in> peoples minds that we are a separate projectI will
suggest another version scheme like the one the Linux distribution Ubuntu uses.The year and month:
9.04, 9.10, 10.4 and 10.10.I know it is very difficult to release at a specific month because there
could be a lot of issues that postpone a release date.Maybe it should only be the target to have
one major release each year and smaller updates and security releases with minor version
numbers:Yearly major release: 11 and 12Update release: 11.1, 11.2 and 12.1Security releases:
11.0.5, 11.1.5, 11.2.5, 12.0.5 and 12.1.5 (security release 5)I think it would be easier to
understand, if it's "classic."Betas: 0.9.1 (Beta 1)1.9.3 ( Third Beta for Version Number 2 ) =>
Mayor ReleaseMayor Release 1.0 , 2.0 ...Update and Security Release: 1.1 1.5 Kind regards
Florian Reisinger
Linz Austria
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.