On Nov 21, 2010, at 19:47 , jonathon wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 11:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
why do we still use their version numbering system.
If version numbers are very different from those used in OOo, then
extensions created for OOo won;t work in LibO, and vice versus.
...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? And only then?
I missed Sean White's message, but I have from the beginning wondered why we're using v3.3 beta and
not v1 beta. LibO is not OOo.
//James
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: Version Numbers? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.