Le 2010-11-22 07:05, Sean White a écrit :
because the underlining code inst changing overly-much, most of the
extensions should be easy to port and in th odd case where an extension is
truely broken by LO's remakes then we can rewrite the plugin from scratch.
As a side not we will probably need a page on the document foundation site
that is for these ported plugins
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM,<bastik.public.mailinglist@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Sean et al:
I have been reading this thread and your idea sounds great! Would you
like to add it to the "ideas" page on the marketing wiki page?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Ideas
It will probably get more attentions there too.
Cheers
Marc
Marketing Member
Drupal Web. Dev. Member
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers? (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers? · Christoph Noack
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.