Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in
peoples minds that we are a separate project.
Not now. The programme is not very different from OpenOffice. As long as
it feels like OpenOffice, I think that calling it "version 1" would be a
throw back in history. Many folks would think they are much better with
OpenOffice... it is at version 3.3, after all.
When (if) a new user interface is developed, then it will be very easy
to sell that the new LibreOffice 1 is an entirely new program.
--
Michel Gagnon
Montréal (Québec, Canada) -- http://mgagnon.net
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.