Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Version Numbers?

On 11/20/2010 2:30 AM, Ron Faile wrote:
> >NoOP is right, I wrote the quoted text. Your explanation is well
> >noted and I can see the reasoning behind it. The sooner we can change
> >the interface and feel of LibreOffice then the better, as I for one
> >don't want such a Oracle aligning feature as version numbers staring
> >me in the face every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite
> >
> >On 11/20/10, NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote:
> >> Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
> >>> On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
> >>>> As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office
> >>>> project
> >>>> derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their 
> version
> >>>> numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to 
> reinforce in
> >>>> peoples minds that we are a separate project.
>
> Take a look at the UI improvements page, 
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Default_UI_Improvements
>
> I just uploaded a file (item 11) with some ideas that might set LibO 
> apart. Namely a new menu structure. Would be interested in your comments.
>
> Ron


--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***