Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 2010-10-06 5:15 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
I agree MSO 2007 and 2010 should be the priority, but a big advantage of
LibO could be that it *can* read older formats.  Government regulations
and company policies often require documents to be retained for years
and sometimes decades.  MSO 2007+ no longer allows opening MSO <97
documents, because it is unable to do so securely.  If LibO can open
these older documents, it's one more reason to switch away from MSO.


Also, since the old formats are pretty much static now, problems should
be minimal, but I also believe that people should still be able to
submit problem documents in those older formats, so if it is something
that can easily be fixed, it should/can be fixed. If not, then the
developer(s) who looked at it should document as much as possible the
resources that would be required to fix it, then submit it to a/the
'bug-bounty' list, so if the issue is near and dear to someone who has
the money to pay to fix it, they can.


Best regards,

To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.