Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure

 Le 07/10/2010 10:25, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
> you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice 
> 3.3.
>
> First of all, this is what we currently have:
>
>  * a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs & QA
>    discussion there):
>    http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
>  * a bugtracker - bugs.freedesktop.org for the while
>    (use
>     https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=ecific&order
> =levance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=LibreOffice&content    to list all currently-filed 
> LibreOffice bugs)
>
>  * a wiki (well, soon ;))
>
>  * the testtool (similar to OpenOffice.org)
>
> I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
> fashion, and add tools as we go (and decide that we need them) - I
> know that the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
> QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we
> really need it, and it's worth the effort to duplicate it/set it
> up".
>
> What do you think?

Hi Thorsten, all,

I think we need something like TCM to manage manual tests of localisation.
I know that Sophie is/was working on a new version of TCM.
She should have some good ideas in this matter.

Best regards

JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.

-- 
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/