Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 08:46 -0700, Keith Curtis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:08 AM, BRM <> wrote:

And TDF/LO is the real fork in this case. In your opinion it would have
been a
necessary fork, but it is the fork nonetheless. Any argument otherwise is
revisionist history.

LO was a fork, but that was the for many months ago.

Yes and the transfer of to Apache is just that, a

I'd add only one other comment - One doesn't have to like something in
order to accept or acknowledge it.

Best wishes,

Drew Jensen

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.