Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gusaas@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2011/01/02 11:24 AM  Italo Vignoli wrote:

On 1/2/11 6:20 PM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:

 Nope, writing back as doc is good enough at this point.

Definitely not. LibreOffice writes OOXML and will write OOXML, and this is
not under discussion. Our developers have the right skills to decide about
the quality and the features of the filter.

LibreOffice should not write OOXML. That is under discussion in this thread.

Who gave you the right to say it is not under discussion? Isn't this a
community project? When did the community decide that writing OOXML has to
be included in LibreOffice?

I think the point was that the developers will decide whether to
support OOXML or not. It is up to them if they decide to take notice
of the conflicting opinions on this list.

Bob

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.