Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sat Jan 01 2011 10:27:02 GMT-0800 (PST)  Ian Lynch wrote:


Another consideration is that if we ignore docx until MS do drop .doc which
is long term inevitable, we could end  up playing catch up in order to get
filter that are good enough to be credible.  Better to start now and
incrementally improve them over time.


How can LibO or any OSS program expect to keep up with MS when they do not even follow "their" own standard? All that anyone has to go on is the standard published by the ISO but MS does not even support it as published. See http://www.adjb.net/post/Microsoft-Fails-the-Standards-Test.aspx as reference.



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.