Christoph Noack wrote:
The interpretation leads to the following: "Many people reports bugs for
one time, only. They are usually less capable of providing more
information to developers - or better: the developers have to take care
to get these information. On the other hand, few people report a lot of
bug reports." This matches my personal experience.
Hi Chris,
quite useful info - I like gut feeling backed up by serious
research. ;)
There may be different and good reasons for users to participate in bug
reporting - but the best (non-automated) system won't be able to collect
that much information in a quality, that developers may simply start to
work on most of the issues. From what I've seen so far, only the
individual discussions on mailing lists or forums led to high-quality
bug reports right from the start. And this is why I think, the community
members on the mailing lists are incredibly helpful (maybe even
essential) for (more) efficient development.
Maybe with the exception of crashes - I'd at least give that a try
(usually backtrace, just-loaded document, and system details gets
you a long way). Apart from that, then, I guess that
EasyBugtrackingWizard should be considered one of the many
opportunities to turn users into participating community members
(and designed with that goal in mind).
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.