Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

2010/11/3 Michael Meeks <>:

On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 17:28 +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote:
Copyright Assignment is nor bad nor good, it's a compromise

       I do not see assignment in -any- way as a compromise; but as an
un-necessary extreme.

like mine, it's an opinion, of course ;-)

i am still waiting to see any reply also to Andrea's proposals
in another thread [1]

       Oh - I guess I should reply there.


I agree with Andrea, and I think that all this JCA stuff need a more
pragmatic approach

       Honestly; the amount of doom mongering

I guess that with this term you mean "profecy of disaster", something
that in italian we could
name "being a Cassandra". I didn't wanted to be a Cassandra; it only
seems to me that
JCA/CLA and similar issues should be discussed openly, with fresh mind,
evaluating pro and con.

in this thread is staggering.
Suddenly we somehow 'discovered' that all FLOSS licenses are
un-enforceable, jurisdictionless, that no-one has really contributed
anything, in any binding way to any eclectically owned FLOSS project[1],
and that only mad people would ship that software :-)

No, the issue here regards a really complex project, more than 12 millions
lines of code, I guess, that needs a transition from the "umbrella" of Oracle to
another model; clearly it's important to conduct the transition in a way
that makes feasible to manage the project in the future.

       If the rational conclusion of these arguments is that the Linux Kernel,
Mozilla, SAMBA, GNOME, KDE, and by extension -all- Linux distributions
are fundamentally unsafe to ship - then we have a huge and un-fixable
problem; but one that is by far beyond the scope of LibreOffice to fix.

I agree; nevertheless, i think we should decide what kind of foundation TDF
would be, and if the foundation could effectively join the interests
all the subjects interested in
LibO (or other projects in the future). Dealing with patent claims is one of
things that i think TDF should take care of, without being necessarily
"doom mongering".

       In particular OpenOffice already has this problem, since it includes
big chunks of Mozilla - which has some form of mild certification of
authenticity - but this only extends to the person doing the committing,
not the code they commit [ from others ] ;-) ie. it is eclectically
owned, and there is no paperwork, or click-through before contributing.

       So at this point, there are two options:

       * throw up arms in dismay, conclude nothing is 'safe', and
         wander around desparately trying to aggregate stronger
         rights to the entire codebase in various organisations
               [ which IMHO aggregates problems with it ].
       * follow the rest of the world including eg. IBM (who are not
         short of lawyers) who already ship eg. Mozilla, SAMBA and
         Linux without any of these apparently indispensible


This dicotomy in my opinion is not reflecting the real situation, nor
I said that
assignments are indispensable. It's a subject should be discussed with
all the players.
By the way, TDF is still not a player, because it still lacks a legal
status ....




[1] - eclectically owned projects are, by far, the vast majority of Free
Software projects.
--  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
Posting guidelines:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.