Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

2010/11/1 Michael Meeks <>:
Hi Andrea,
Now, without copyright assignment/agreement (granted by the LibreOffice
developers to the Document Foundation), the Document Foundation will be
in the awkward situation I described: it manages a product (LibreOffice)
but cannot represent the LibreOffice developers since it doesn't own the

       Sure - it can recommend, advise, and encourage people in directions; it
can lead the project via the brand, it can encourage collaboration and
resolve conflicts - but sure; it is not a monolithic entity that can
dictate ownership of the code.

Nor it could help contributors in any way, if they are sued because of
their contribution.

Copyright Assignment is nor bad nor good, it's a compromise; i am
still waiting to see
any reply also to Andrea's proposals in another thread [1] .
I agree with Andrea, and I think that all this JCA stuff need a more
pragmatic approach,
when the TDF will become a stable entity with a legal peronality the
big players can deal with.



Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
Posting guidelines:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.