Hi Gianluca,
Von: "Gianluca Turconi" <ml@letturefantastiche.com>
I've read that post, but I think you're reiterating an old misconception
by confusing the Document Foundation with the wider LibreOffice Community.
Hmm .. so the first topic (term definition "Member") is not very clear.
I'm not speaking about members of legal entity "The Docuemnt Foundation"
but of those people who will be recognised as the community able
to influence the legal entitie's decisions.
The Document Foundation should be like the kernel (or nucleus of a cell)
that pursue specific purposes (included in its Charter) that the rest of
the system (or cell, the Community) considers valuable and agrees to
support.
I tend to disagree here - while the Foundation is bound to it's charter
community should not just support the Foundation because they "like"
the Foundation, but because they can influence the way the foundation acts.
Hypothetical example: Google Corp. develops a large chunk of code for
LibreOffice. It's an important contribution, of course, and Google would
belong to the wider LibO community, but is this big contribution enough to
join the steering group of TDF?
No - but it enough for those people at google, who contributed this code
to be eligible for a seat in the board. And it is enough to have a
vote at board elections.
IMO, no, because you should contribute *and* formally and publicly
share TDF principles *in the past and present and facts*, in order to
join the foundation steering institutions.
Oh - this is written in the "basic principles":
Members need to agree to the charter of the foundation
Isn't this clear enough? (I just to try to understand your point)
Another hypothetical example: tomorrow, Microsoft CEO wakes up and says to
TDF: "Here is a 20 million per year check in order to develop XYZ future
in LibreOffice, can we join TDF and its steering group?" The twenty
million income is surely a good thing ;-)
Sorry, if you think, that this would establish the right to be accepted
as a "Member" you did not read the page at all :(
There is curerntly no "by in" option to become a member.
IMVHO, a double request, contribution *and* acceptation *in the facts* of
the Charter's purposes, should be the base of any "membership" within TDF.
again: I tried to have exacrtly this at the basic principles
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Membership#basic_principles_for_members
regards,
André
--
GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos.
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] [SC] How to define "Membership" within TDF? (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] [SC] How to define "Membership" within TDF? · Sebastian Spaeth
Re: [tdf-discuss] [SC] How to define "Membership" within TDF? · Andre Schnabel
Re: [tdf-discuss] [SC] How to define "Membership" within TDF? · Sebastian Spaeth
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.