Re: [tdf-discuss] [MAILING LIST] interim structuring - a proposal

Hi Thorsten,

2010/10/4 Thorsten Behrens <thb@documentfoundation.org>:
> Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Also I think QA@ is a good thing.
> I think I fundamentally disagree on this one - the interface between
> QA and Dev is incredibly huge, I'd even venture the proposition that
> ideally there's no difference (in core competencies - maybe there is
> one in attitude ;)) - at any rate, the chasm between the OpenOffice
> project's QA and Dev teams is something I *do not* want to
> transplant into our new project.
>
> Ideally, I want QA folks to take notice if the Devs start debating
> details of specific features, and conversely, I want Devs to take
> notice of QA talking about specific "problem areas" in the product.
But you should also be aware that there are much qa-people which are
doing just testing.
These are not so "technical" and wouldn't like to read or even
understand the things on the dev-list. And there is much
organisational stuff around the testing which wouldn't interest the
developers.

Just my 2c

Volker
-- 
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/