On 2010-10-04 4:27 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
So I think we'll end up with different infrastructure bits for each
of the teams. But if it is about collaboration, we shouldn't be that
far away from each other - may it be working in small teams or being
located on the same mailing list.
Somehow, we have to bridge that gap ...
How about creating a single 'collaberation' list, that only accepts
messages from designated members of the other lists (we could use
volunteers for this), and these designated 'collaberators' wouild be
responsible for sending messages to the 'collaberation' list to notify
everyone that a conversation that affects one or more of the others is
occurring on whatever the other list is - then someone could go read
that thread and comment or take whatever action is appropriate.
The collab list could require [TAGS] in the subject, one [TAG] for each
of the other lists.
This way developers could just be members of their respective list, and
the collab list, and (using filters on the [TAGS] easily monitor issues
on the collab list that pertained to them...
Just a rough idea, but maybe could be made to work...?
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] [WEB] interim structuring - a proposal (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy