Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Hi Florian, *,

Am 26.10.2011 16:45 schrieb Florian Effenberger:

at least once a week, I even get mislead mails from one of our admins,
who I think of being technically very experienced. The admin lists
doesn't have reply-to mangling, and lots of content is missing on the
list, because people always reply to me directly.

I don't see the problem, to resend such a mail to the list after a


I have seen users of mutt, Google Mail and a few other mail clients

I've seen comlaining many people many things ;o)). As said it's a matter
of rising efficiency of mail communication in general rather than
running after (or ignoring) personal complaints.


My take would be to use one of the more prominent lists to try out the
results - preferably users@, or in case we want to exclude that list,
something like discuss@ could be a good starter.

Agreed. But before changing anything, I'll go and look to make the
posting guidelines more descriptive in terms of making essential
information available instantly. I'll come back here, when done. If
anyone want's to participate the work - welcome! :o)).

In case pure chaos arises, we need to rethink the strategy, in case
things work out well, we might adapt that for other lists.

Changing without complementary action will deliver the prove of chaos
arising. :o)).

What do you think?

Your take, changing discuss@ is a good one, but some care is needed to
make it a success.

Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.