Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-10-16 16:50:
Thanks. So here is an explanation, a statement, some pro and con etc.
thanks a lot!
Interesting, my mileage indeed does vary here. ;-) We have a few
internal lists with experts and without reply-to-mangling, and every
once in a while, a mail dedicated to the list only reaches the original
poster, which is odd. :)
What we do on our public lists is the following:
1. We remove any existing Reply-To-header.
2. We set the Reply-To-header to the list.
Would you like to avoid both? Or would simply removing #1 do? That, in a
nutshell, would mean:
1. If you simply send a message to the list, the Reply-To gets fixed to
the list, i.e. replies are always sent to the list.
2. If you set a Reply-To, this will be preserved, but the list will be
*added* to the current Reply-To-header.
Would that do?
Florian Effenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
(message not available)
- Re: [tdf-moderators] reply-to mangling (continued)
- [tdf-moderators] Re: reply-to mangling · Florian Effenberger
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy