Hi Florian, *,
Am 21.11.2011 09:05 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-11-21 01:01:
I want to see, whether there are more people who support kind of
general comunication style agreement, where better to use Netiquette
is a first step as well as switching off reply-to mangling.
If I see support, we'll make the schedule there, if not I'll stop that
thing for now and won't block You any longer.
Sound's like a deal? :o))
ok, feel free to do so - but I would like to get things done soon. Soon
meaning within the next two weeks. Otherwise it becomes ridiculous ;-)
I'm with You on that, therefore I skipped thinking about promising
something I couldn't promise within that timeframe.
I target to have a decision at end of this week, either delaying my
approach (and disconnecting it from the "reply-to mangling" thing) or
having a consensus about the further schedule.
Friedrich
--
Friedrich Strohmaier
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
http://www.documentfoundation.org/
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to moderators+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-moderators] reply-to mangling (continued)
(message not available)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.