Hi Florian, *,
Am 23.10.2011 16:51 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-10-20 23:25:
I nevertheless support to do that change due to the above stated risk.
the question is, what exactly do we want to have. Shall I simply
disabling the removal of user-added reply-to headers, or shall I also
disable the addition of reply-to: list?
For scenario 1, if mlmmj does what it is supposed to, the default
reply-to header would be set to the list, but any user-created reply-to
header would be *added* to that, i.e. does not get lost like it does not.
leave user added reply-to alone, don't set reply-to $list.
So simply "answer" will answer the author wherever she likes, "answer to
list" will do as described. And both will do as intended.
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy