Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Cor Nouws wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote (05-11-11 13:02)
when it comes to user support the people
involved are much more pragmatic
That would be my expectation too. And then 'people involved', I would
read as those with questions, answers and with moderation tasks.

Yes, that was my understanding.

But I'd still give a thought if we can't really avoid the massive
duplication of effort and, through simple DNS tweaking, offer the same
forum under the two adresses and ...
Sounds as an interesting idea. Then both could redirect to say (just to give it a name now) which
should have a look that is more neutral and serving both.

You don't need a third "neutral" URL: people accessing through would always just see that URL, exactly as it happens now with and (which are totally equivalent, and if you use one you don't notice that the other one exists). And branding can be adapted too, and possibly made dependent on the URL. But technology is really easy in this case: the main issue, as I wrote, is political.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.