Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Well, it turns out many people seem to want to use forums, and most of
them are not technical, they are end users so I don't expect they have
the same needs as developers. I just assume there's no fundamental truth
in either mailing list or forums usage...
No idea. And bear in mind that I'm sufficiently clueless about forum
usage patterns that the following comments should be taken with a
larger dose of salt -
what *I* think is that Joe Random User typically wields his search
engine of choice, and clicks on whatever appears promising on the
first result page - and *then* maybe gets sucked into whatever
forum/list/stackexchange platform is behind that link.
Or is there an existing community of LibreOffice user support folks
over at the forums, that we'd want to accomodate (or OOo supporters,
that would want to also help out on a new forum)?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [tdf-discuss] user forums ? · Thorsten Behrens
Re: [tdf-discuss] user forums ? · Stefan Weigel
Re: [tdf-discuss] user forums ? · Jean-Baptiste Faure
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.