Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Simon Phipps <simon -AT- webmink.com>
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:36:02 +0100


On 10 Jun 2011, at 16:53, Jim Jagielski wrote:


I would recommend that TDF make their own determinations...
After all, it would be trivially easy for someone at the ASF
to make a counterpoint blogpost recommending AL... If people
are swayed by what FSF (or anyone else) says without giving
thoughtful and honest consideration for their *own* s/w,
then FOSS is in big, big trouble.


I don't speak for TDF, so I can't comment on your advice, Jim. But I can't help thinking FSF were 
forced to make a statement by the repeated public misinterpretation of their licensing advice by 
folk driving the proposal at ASF.

S.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.