On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
2011/6/10 Thorsten Behrens <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
Clearly marking the website, signatures, etc. for TDF would probably go a long
ways in helping to end that conversation.
Since we're now down to debating cosmetics - could we please end the
discussion here & all get back to work? TDF will be legally
established in due course, quite a few people are working on that.
Some more fundamental (not just cosmetical) insights actually have
been published by the FSF:
I would recommend that TDF make their own determinations...
After all, it would be trivially easy for someone at the ASF
to make a counterpoint blogpost recommending AL... If people
are swayed by what FSF (or anyone else) says without giving
thoughtful and honest consideration for their *own* s/w,
then FOSS is in big, big trouble.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy