On 10 Jun 2011, at 07:25, Simon Brouwer wrote:
I don't understand your reasoning in that last part.
In which case, having already made a huge effort to explain clearly and factually, I give up.
Yes there is an existing legal entity in the picture, but it is not TDF but FroDEV, and it is not
a foundation but an association.
Makes no difference in this instance. I suggest you find someone who understands to have an
in-person conversation with them.
S.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.