[tdf-discuss] Re: A better idea for a download package.

plino <pedlino -AT- gmail.com>
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 04:05:07 -0800 (PST)


NoOp, I think we agree on the minimal installer size.

I apologize for the reply mess. I'm not used to this mailing list tool. If I
reply via nabble, I can't quote. If I reply via Gmail, I can't quote but the
reference to whom the reply was doesn't work...

It is clear that the huge installer is temporary but a smaller installer
plus all language packs takes less than 2Gb, which seems negligible...

It would be nice to have some feedback from the developers on which path
they are following (I know this isn't the dev mailing list...)

Please someone setup a proper Forum ASAP ;)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-proposal-for-effective-volunteer-friendly-user-support-in-LibreOffice-tp1954148p2005553.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context

[tdf-discuss] Re: A better idea for a download package. (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.