Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
We initially agreed not to request the assignment of copyright for code
contributions, and we can only witness that it's been so far the right
decision: Many developers have joined us and contribute
Honestly, I believe new developers joined because the bar for
contribution was lowered to the point that anyone who can use a text
editor can contribute to the code, even if he is unable to build
LibreOffice. The Easy Hacks were a nice way to attract new people. Of
course the paperwork reduction may have helped too, but I don't see it
as the most effective improvement.
3) ... In the CVS (and even SVN) there was a real hierarchy. ...
BTW; LibreOffice uses Git, which is a distributed SCM.
So did (and still does) OpenOffice.org with Mercurial, another
distributed SCM. But I don't believe this is relevant.
4) the notion that we cannot change license because we don't have
copyright assignment needs to be put to rest once and for all today.
There is a very simple explanation with respect to this issue; ask any
lawyer and he/she will confirm this: Sun/Oracle has licensed the OOo
code under LGPL v3. They could have put "LGPL v3 or later" or "LGPL v3
or +". But they didn't. And that's what makes impossible to turn OOo
into a different license unless the sole copyright owner agrees to
change it, which is unlikely with Oracle.
Well, if you take for granted that cooperation between Oracle and the
Document Foundation will forever be impossible then you are right. But
who knows what will happen in months, years? If Oracle changes attitude
and wants to discuss licensing with the Document Foundation, the
Document Foundation will be in the awkward position of "representing"
the LibreOffice developers only in theory, because any agreement would
then need to be confirmed with every developer; while with a copyright
agreement/assignment in place, the Document Foundation could effectively
represent a measurable percentage of the codebase, and its opinion be
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to email@example.com
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy