On 2010-10-12 4:27 PM, todd rme wrote:
So yes, they are less than the core components, but I wouldn't say
they are insignificant. You could cut out about 40% of the download
size if you just wanted some of the smaller components.
But they are designed to work together, and as has been explained,
splitting them up is far from a trivial task, and would almost certainly
introduce all kinds of stability and performance issues.
Regardless, I don't see much benefit in continuing to talk about it
now... the next step is make a formal enhancement request and see what
the developers say as to complexity and/or likelihood of it ever happening.
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates) · jonathon
Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates) · Scott Furry
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.