On 2010-10-09 12:42 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Yes, you are right. But in this case the service would be offered to
them and it would be up to the distros to either use it or not. Or the
user of that particular distro would then have the option of installing
it if wished.
And if they don't it is a waste of resources...
I'll reiterate: most distros will want to build their own packages
anyway, so just provide a well documented, stable/standard pipe to the
code (already done), provide full/complete packaging instructions, and
let the individual distros make their own packages.
Of course, I see no reason that a formal process could not be in place
for smaller distros to request assistance to have packages provided for
them - then at least it wouldn't be wasted effort.
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates) · jonathon
Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates) · Scott Furry
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.