Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi @all, 

Am Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:23:39 -0600
schrieb Scott Furry <scott.wl.furry@gmail.com>:

  LibreOffice Community,


[...]

 From what we have heard on this topic so far:

- Mac users have commented that they do not have an issue with the 
current installer available on the Mac platform.

- Window users indicated that an update mechanism would be great.
Some commented that the current Windows installer leaves artifacts
behind. The Windows Installer does not detect/remove previous
installations properly.

- Linux users have discussed vast amounts opinions on packaging in 
Linux. Some have questioned if distributing packages is a good thing.

-----------------------

This survey is to gauge the views of the LibreOffice community on the 
install/update method of LibreOffice. Please voice your opinion so
that these considerations may be taken into account when the
LibreOffice method of install/update is studied by the developer
team. Please *bottom-post* your opinions.

I am using mostly Linux (Mandriva, hopefully soon Mageia) and only
occasionally Windows XP. 
 
How do you expect LibreOffice to be updated?

I would love to have incremental updates, but I fear it might get too
complicated if one or more updates are skipped inbetween. 
 
How do you Install/Update LibreOffice?

I have two versions of OOo/LibO installed - once the version that came
with my Linux distro and then the vanilla version, installed with
rpm/urpmi. This works great for me, because the two versions are
installed in different paths. 
 
What do you expect when Installing/Updating LibreOffice?

That it works. ;-)
I would want to have different installation paths, so that I can
continue having two versions of OOo/LibO. 
 
Other programs have separate updating programs (iTunes being an 
example), if it was technically feasible, would having a separate 
install program for LibreOffice (with updating features) be useful to
you?
 
Not for Linux. For Windows I can see that it might be useful. 

Would having a download and update site, as well as a Unix|Linux
package repository site, be of value to you?

Not particularly. I am happy with downloading the zipped file and
unpacking it on my system. But I am sure, that I would use the
repository if it is available. I have doubts nonetheless, if it is easy
to have all the mandatory extra files (hdlist.cz for Mandriva, don't
know what kind of file the other distros need) that tell the user what
is available in this repository. 

Sigrid

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.