Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates)

 On 09/10/10 03:13 PM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2010/10/9 Scott Furry<scott.wl.furry@gmail.com>:
> > And IMO that is the point. Distributions will only incorporate into the
> > releases what /they feel/ is appropriate.
> And is that wrong? If you want "the last" on your computer "as soon as
> possible", then you need to change to a rolling release distro...
> There is a reason because there are so many distros out there: they
> are different. If you need to upgrade the very second there is a new
> version of software X then you need a bleeding edge distro,
I disagree.

As you suggest, there is the core software,  and is also a host of 
software applications (some even have their own QA/Testing programs - 
Mozilla being a prominent example).

If that's what openSUSE does, great! But users of other distributions 
have different needs and level of knowledge. They have chosen their 
distribution/platform. Should LibO not respect that user decision?

Holding back on incorporating another software program, from my 
understanding, is done because of distribution revision testing/development.

AFAIK, some distributions (for example Debian 
stable/unstable/testing/experimental) show a tendency to not incorporate 
software major revisions (i.e. software ver x.y.z increases from 1.1.1 
to 2.0.0) . Should users be punished because the development cycles of 
the distribution and software group are different?

Regards,
Scott Furry

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/