Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2010-10-09 14:23, Scott Furry a écrit :

 From what I have seen on this topic so far:
- Mac users (three? ) have commented that they do not have an issue with
the current installer.
- In the initial thread, many Windows Users indicated that an update
mechanism would be great.
- Some commented the current Windows installer leaves artifacts behind
- Windows Installer does not detect/remove previous installations
- Lots (vast) amounts of discussion on packaging in Linux
- some have question if distributing packages is a good thing

What would be nice to see discussion on from the *community*:
- How do you expect LibO to be updated?
- What are your use cases of Install/Update
- Other programs have separate updating programs (iTunes being an
example), if it was technically feasible, would having this feature be
useful to you?
- Would having a download site/accessible package repository be of value
to you?

Regards,
Scott Furry



Thanks for the great summary. I agree, direction from the whole community on this, now that we have hashed it out a bit, would give clearer direction of expectations.This would have to be presented as a new thread. Scott, the placement of the platforms would all have to show in the same order in the sentences with a little rewording. The choice of vocabulary would have to be within everybody's grasp of their understanding in English -- clear wording. It could be something like this?

=======================

From what we have heard on this topic so far:

- Mac users have commented that they do not have an issue with the current installer available on the Mac platform.

- Window users indicated that an update mechanism would be great. Some commented that the current Windows installer leaves artifacts behind. Windows installer does not detect/remove previous installations properly.

- Linux users have discussed vast amounts opinions on packaging in Linux. Some have questioned if distributing packages is a good thing.

-----------------------

This survey is to gauge the views of the LibO community on the install/update method of LibO. Please voice your opinion so that these considerations may be taken into account when the LibO method of install/update is studied by the developer team.

- How do you expect LibO to be updated?
- What are your use cases of Install/Update
- Other programs have separate updating programs (iTunes being an example), if it was technically feasible, would having this feature be useful to you? - Would having a download site/accessible package repository be of value to you?

=======================

This is just an example of how we could phrase it to the community. Feel free to modify are rework completely. But I think that Scott did put all of these arguments in correctly.

This could then be put to the community as a new thread and the results could be monitored/taken into note for the future planning of the LibO method of updates from the dev team.

Marc



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.