Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure

Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
> fashion

As I understood from an earlier message of yours, LibreOffice 3.3 will 
be heavily based on OOo 3.3 and I thus agree with the "lightweight testing".

> the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
> QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we
> really need it

I actually believe that these are fundamental tools to assess quality of 
a build, and that insufficient testing could mean that LibreOffice is 
doomed to be "the nicer but more buggy brother of OOo" forever in the 
public opinion.

At least, I recommend that new tests are written for any LibreOffice 
specific functionality, that we have a tool to track them (kind of TCM) 
and a tool to track releases (QATrack being the natural candidate here).

Regards,
  Andrea Pescetti.
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/