Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure

 Hi Thorsten,

Thorsten Behrens skrev 2010-10-07 10:25:
> Hi,
>
> as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
> you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
> 3.3.
>
> First of all, this is what we currently have:
>
>   * a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs&  QA
>     discussion there):
>     http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
>   * a bugtracker - bugs.freedesktop.org for the while
>     (use
>      https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=ecific&order
> =levance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=LibreOffice&content    to list all currently-filed 
> LibreOffice bugs)
>
>   * a wiki (well, soon ;))
>
>   * the testtool (similar to OpenOffice.org)
>
> I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
> fashion, and add tools as we go (and decide that we need them) - I
> know that the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
> QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we
> really need it, and it's worth the effort to duplicate it/set it
> up".

This may not the most important thing for the first release, but in the 
long run QATrack would serve as a dashboard for the different statuses 
for different rc's for different languages. If we want to use it, I 
would be happy to set it up for you. The prerequisite is a server to put 
it on, which I could find out.

The other tools are great tools for the initial release, and also some 
written tests as the qa starts?

Best

Per
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/