On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:00:15 -0300
Martín Olivera <martin.olivera@gmail.com> wrote:
I like the name very much, because it enhances i18n, it is a "more
universal" name, and it shows that multilingualism is important and global
multicultural cooperation is possible, or better, LibreOffice is a fact of
these both issues became reality
That's the way I feel about it, too. The only problem I see applies for
all names we might choose for the project: Ordinary people have just
started to recognise the "brand" OpenOffice, it might take them years
to adapt to a new name.
But, in general, I really like "LibreOffice" and do not feel it needs
to be changed.
Klaus
--
Klaus Doblmann B.A. - FSF member #7570
Web: http://www.dokla.net - meine neue Seite (derzeit im Aufbau)
Blog: http://straightrazorguy.net
PGP-Key: http://dokla.net/pgp_key.asc
http://twitter.com/klausdoblmann
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.