On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:16 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04, Graham Lauder <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Document Foundation is obviously cast in stone because that is a legal entity
but the product name should be up for discussion right now when it's most
Being pedantic here, according to Sophie in a note on a thread titled
'[Legalese] "Foundation" or "Group"?' on Oct 1, the Document Foundation
is not in fact a legal entity yet. (I was surprised to read this.)
Currently it's a group and the Foundation is not up yet, we will set
it up with the community members who wish to contribute to it. We are
planing to write a charter, organization, governance, duties, etc...
not only the small group who has launched the project, but all of the
people who are willing to be part of the Foundation.
For the moment, the German association is helping us to structure the
whole thing and have a legal backup, but we still have a lot of work
to move to an official foundation.
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to email@example.com
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] [GENERAL] New name · Olav Dahlum
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy