On Monday 04 Oct 2010 10:10:41 Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Let me clear so that we can move on: Unless Oracle gives us the trademark o
OpenOffice.org, we're using LibreOffice, and some people love it, some
people hate it, but as a matter of fact, we're not changing it anymore, so
it's useless to request a change.
Tsk Charles, that's a rather dictatorial attitude for an Open Source project.
Everything should be open for discussion at all times and given that
LibreOffice was selected as only an interim name and until Oracle says Yay or
Nay it remains interim or a draft concept, then I would suggest now is the
best time to discuss it.
Document Foundation is obviously cast in stone because that is a legal entity
but the product name should be up for discussion right now when it's most
Rons earlier point about name selection with an internal focus rather than
going to the market is a very good one. He certainly convinced me.
And you may remember(or not) that I've been vociferous in the defence of the
OpenOffice.org name in the past. But this seems sensible
OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ
OpenOffice.org Migration and training Consultant.
INGOTs Assessor Trainer
(International Grades in Open Technologies)
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
- Re: [tdf-discuss] [GENERAL] New name (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy