On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Sigrid Carrera
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:37:15 -0400
Greg Stein <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:04, Simon Phipps <email@example.com> wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote:
For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions
become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not
be able to take it.
can someone enlighten me please? What is ICLA or a non-CLA?
I have no idea and would like to know, what you're talking about.
Here is the ASF's ICLA:
Note: this is *not* a copyright assignment. People who contribute
code, documentation, or other changes to the ASF retain full copyright
of their work. All this ICLA does is establish clearly that the
contributor grants to the ASF has all necessary rights (within their
ability to do so) to distribute this Work.
- Sam Ruby
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy