Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Simon,

Simon Brouwer wrote on 2011-06-18 17.48:

Have a look at the first sentence on the homepage. It simply states that
TDF is a Foundation, while strictly spoken, it isn't (yet). The lack of
clear information about this on the website might lead outsiders to
suspect that TDF want to sweep some uncomfortable facts under the rug.
The word "Foundation" in this sentence could be made a web link to a
page that explains about the current situation and the progress towards
becoming an actual foundation. That way, things would become much
clearer. After the foundation is established, the link could point to
the Statutes and similar information.

we do share a lot of the current status, e.g. in our blog, but I agree
that the wording might be misleading. I just forwarded the topic to the
steering-discuss list for feedback from the SC. Thanks for the pointer,


Florian Effenberger <>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/ @floeff

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.