Allen Pulsifer wrote:
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
...you don't discuss e.g. trademark issues on a public list, if you want
to stand a chance actually obtaining it.
I can see how you might believe this, but I'm not sure it is grounded in
fact or experience.
Hi Allen, oh, I was referring to LibreOffice / TDF here.
[handing OOo to ASF]
Regardless of who's "fault" this is, had the discussions been done in public
and involved all of the community instead of a select group, the results
might have been different.
You lost me here - it was Oracle who decided this behind closed
doors. If that was the point you wanted to make earlier, then I of
course agree that this was unfortunate.
That's water under the bridge at this point, but given the
results, a little bit of introspection and willingness to make
accommodations might benefit everyone.
That's universally true, indeed. :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.